Current HeadlinesMotif XS Demo Contest
We're putting together new Motif XS demos for the website and for store displays...
Motif the platform for epic DVD on analog-style synthesis and digital effects
Everyone needs to be a synth programmer or engineer nowadays. And not just keybo...
2007 Motif Loyalty Program
The new 2007 Motif Loyalty Program is available to US customers who are purchasi...
DCP Motif XS format Voice Libraries
DCP's Dave Polich is one of the leading Motif sound designers, who has worked on...
ArpManager software released!
ArpManager is a PC application that lets you, literally, manage your User Arpegg...
Keane 2007 interview
Keane back on the road again in US. "Piano-based (Motif, S90, CP70...) British t...
New music contest announced
January 18 th 2007, Santa Cruz, California: “Mix It & Motifate It,” a brand new ...
Yamaha shows Motif XS at Winter NAMM
Yamaha is showing the forthcoming Motif XS at the 2007 Winter NAMM Show at the A...
Yamaha shows MM6 at Winter NAMM
Yamaha is showing the new MM6 at the 2007 Winter NAMM Show at the Anaheim Conven...
MoBros & Mo'Sis's welcome at Winter NAMM!
January 18 th 2007, Anaheim, California: YamahaUS, MrMotif, BadMister, DavePolic...
Motifator.com 2.0 launched
January 18 th 2007, Santa Cruz, California: Motifator.com 2.0. Phase One launche...
Hot Salsa Beats in Motif format
October 20 th 2006, Santa Cruz, California: The infectious world of Salsa comes ...
New sounds for stage and studio
December 20 th 2006, Santa Cruz, California: Hot from Germany comes a new collec...
Separation and Coordination
My own computer experiences date back to the development of the IBM System/360 (on a "Usability Team", what today is called the UI) and I've (painfully) kept up with the technology.
Each of us have our own needs. I'm not a master of my ES. I need to coordinate interfaces, experiment with different samples, play with different effects to see just what they are/do, Sometimes I need to do them at the same time (hence Windows). (I can recite the 6800 instruction set in my sleep, so this isn't a "Smack Mac" comment. My needs include more open architecture than Mac offers, that's all.)
I'm primarily a woodwind player, so the MO keyboard is already a compromise. I don't like the fixed vibrato in the woodwinds, and need to modify it. As the above comment points out, that 20" screen is a lot easier to use to edit such parameters than an LCD. The computer allows me to feed through my MIDI mixer/merger; the computer allows me to see a wave form in a sample, cut and fine-tune loops, EQ points, etc.; it allows me to see and edit MIDI events; and, when I'm all done, the computer also lets me mix and feed through my DSPs to hear, and eventually master, a major mix.
Expandability of the MotifES was one of it's selling points. My mLan is, as Yamaha advertized, the "missing link," at least for me.
The other side of this equation is the fallacy of an "All-in-One" solution: often this means a device does everything so poorly that it's a waste of time and money. I don't want to play riffs on my computer keyboard, and I don't want to edit waveforms on an LCD screen. I do want to integrate sound modules and sample memory into my instrument, and I do want to enhance the ability of my devices to communicate with each other.
In sum, I think that the choice comes down to the needs of the user: if what you need is portability/mobility for performances, put it all into one package and take it away. If you need to bring multiple components together, and/or to edit elements, you need some device that allows such flexibility--and, as of this writing, that means the computer.