Current HeadlinesMotif XS Demo Contest
We're putting together new Motif XS demos for the website and for store displays...
Motif the platform for epic DVD on analog-style synthesis and digital effects
Everyone needs to be a synth programmer or engineer nowadays. And not just keybo...
2007 Motif Loyalty Program
The new 2007 Motif Loyalty Program is available to US customers who are purchasi...
DCP Motif XS format Voice Libraries
DCP's Dave Polich is one of the leading Motif sound designers, who has worked on...
ArpManager software released!
ArpManager is a PC application that lets you, literally, manage your User Arpegg...
Keane 2007 interview
Keane back on the road again in US. "Piano-based (Motif, S90, CP70...) British t...
New music contest announced
January 18 th 2007, Santa Cruz, California: “Mix It & Motifate It,” a brand new ...
Yamaha shows Motif XS at Winter NAMM
Yamaha is showing the forthcoming Motif XS at the 2007 Winter NAMM Show at the A...
Yamaha shows MM6 at Winter NAMM
Yamaha is showing the new MM6 at the 2007 Winter NAMM Show at the Anaheim Conven...
MoBros & Mo'Sis's welcome at Winter NAMM!
January 18 th 2007, Anaheim, California: YamahaUS, MrMotif, BadMister, DavePolic...
Motifator.com 2.0 launched
January 18 th 2007, Santa Cruz, California: Motifator.com 2.0. Phase One launche...
Hot Salsa Beats in Motif format
October 20 th 2006, Santa Cruz, California: The infectious world of Salsa comes ...
New sounds for stage and studio
December 20 th 2006, Santa Cruz, California: Hot from Germany comes a new collec...
What a rich subject! I was
What a rich subject!
I was mired with computers and music back in the late 80's, early 90's, and got so frustrated and side-tracked from actually making music that i haven't used computers for music since. I know though that using sequencers, samplers, voice editors, librarians, computer technologies that augment what a hardware keyboard can do, makes it so much more powerful and capable.
But Dave, you're in the business- so many people that have a lot of great programs running on desktop and laptop computers have spent the time 'cause they have to, but for a lot of us, even those of us with some degree of techinical inclination, we don't always have a ton of time, money, etc. for getting proficient with a computer; music is something we're doing with the precious spare time we have. Getting up to speed with a computer set-up, or even a keyboard, is a major investment of time.
I do agree with the person in an earlier post who was talking about how computers need to be seemlessly integrated so that you can be an artist, not a technician or an engineer. The days when i was doing a lot of computer recording using a desktop, i began to resent the engineers mindset i needed in order to have those incredibly powerful tools for my music.
I guess my larger point is that in these various user interfaces, whether for a computer or a workstationk there need s to be a built-in system for the work/play flow. For example, the new XS is touted for being able to just hit Record, and you've captured your moment- invaluable advances like that where the engineer/musicians have come up with fast, intuitive, spontaneous, fun, rewarding ways of working, and building it into the interface.
I WANT to like using computers for music making/recording/shaping, and am eagerly anticipating how well the XS is integrated with the computer for a satisfying, not-overly-technical music making experience.
And WHEN!? are manufacturers of such incredibly powerful and technical capabilities going to start including built-in tutorials? Serious, I-can-do-specific-tasks, step-by-step tutorials?????????????? To me that seems like such a no-brainer: if you desire the maximum number of people that want to buy your product and get excited by it 'cause they can do cool shit with it, they need training for gods sake!
Whether a DVD, internet video/flash or whatever, there needs to be tutorials addressed to specific groups (Jazz players, techno, one-man-bands, church groups, etc.). In video form that wouldn't be that hard / expensive to produce (like a more comprehensive job than Roland does for its Fantoms). That would give that manufacturer a significant boost- far too many players never use even the cool,fairly easy capabilities of a synth, there's just so much to learn-